Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Incendiary Minds: Part 1

A positive thing that stands out from having lived abroad for 14 years is the fact that I was exposed to different thoughts and ideas.  I truly understood the "out-of-the box" cliche...to start thinking and more importantly, I believe, to question my own beliefs. 

I pretty much "woke up" in 2003 - brought about by the (still) incredulous invasion of Iraq.  This made me realize a number of things: human beings are easily manipulated (see George Orwell's seminal "1984"), we do not know everything, most of us are "asleep," religion has its negatives, we are basically selfish creatures, among others.  I had read somewhere that 29 years old is the age when a person's beliefs are galvanized - I suppose I, being a late bloomer, was four years late.

What do I label myself now?  I think I've narrowed it down to a progressive, pacifist, radical, liberal, anarcho (no enforced authority), Socialist Democrat, Christian.  A mouthful and also contradictory, I agree.

Of all the definitions given for Socialism the one I identify most with is this given by the writer Howard Zinn: "Socialism basically said, hey, let's have a kinder, gentler society. Let's share things. Let's have an economic system that produces things not because they're profitable for some corporation, but produces things that people need."

It was also during this period - curious why a "Christian" nation would advocate war - that I decided to read the four gospels to find out for myself what Jesus Christ stood for.  I came to the conclusion that if he lived in the present, he'd be labeled an iconoclastic, radical, left-leaning troublemaker.  That it is not the conservatives, who have co-opted Christianity, that Jesus would most probably be comfortable with.  That it was the conservatives (who were violently opposed to the change he was proposing) of his time that had him killed.   

Zinn, who passed away early this year, became famous for having written a history of the U.S. from the perspective of the common people and not from the political and economic elite (read " A People's History of the United States").  His chapter on the American occupation of the Philippines is revelatory - a precursor to its involvement in Vietnam and Iraq. 

The U.S. - because of the freedoms it holds dearly - is startlingly diverse.  It is home not just to nut jobs from the left and the right but, more importantly, to wide-open, compassionate people like Zinn, Noam Chomsky and even an envelope-pushing comedian like Bill Hicks.

The Philippines will benefit greatly if more out-of-the-box thinkers emerge and be an influence on the country.  I think we've collectively settled into a rut...into a fixed false belief that the current system that was handed down to us, the ideas we hold on to...is the only way.

Howard Zinn, when asked what he wanted to be remembered for said, "I guess if I want to be remembered for anything, it’s for introducing a different way of thinking about the world, about war, about human rights, about equality, for getting more and more people to think that way.
Also, for getting more people to realize that the power which rests so far in the hands of people with wealth and guns, that the power ultimately rests in people themselves and that they can use it. At certain points in history, they have used it. Black people in the South used it. People in the women’s movement used it. People in the anti-war movement used it. People in other countries who have overthrown tyrannies have used it.
I want to be remembered as somebody who gave people a feeling of hope and power that they didn’t have before."
When asked about his philosophy: "I believe, I suppose, in what could be called democratic socialism. I believe that we need a society where the motive for the economic system is not corporate profit, but the motive is the welfare of people, health care, jobs, child care, and so on. But that is dominant. Where there is a greater equalization of wealth and a society which is peaceful, which devotes its resources to helping people in the country and elsewhere.
I believe in a world where war is no longer the recourse for the settling of grievances and problems. I believe in the wiping out of national boundaries.
I don’t believe in visas and passports and immigration quotas. I think we need to move toward a global society. They use the word “globalization,” but they use it in a very narrow sense to mean the freedom of corporations to move across boundaries. But what we need is a freedom of people and things to move across boundaries."
His advise to us: "Think for yourself.  Don't believe what the people up there tell you.  Don't depend on saviors...or our leaders to do what must be done."  'nuff said.  Howard Zinn, may you keep fighting the good fight wherever you are.
 

We Don't Do Concerted

"Noy" has been chosen by the Film Academy of the Philippines (FAP) as  the country's entry to the Best Foreign Language Film at the 83rd Academy Awards.  Have seen but I won't do an in-depth review of it as there are better writers who have done very good pieces on it:  Here and here.  In a word, though, it's embarrassing.   

It seems to have been a heartfelt and sincere project that, however, manages to come off as immature and naive.  Sincerity, I suppose, doesn't make for great art.  What stands out:

- It preaches about taking a critical view of personalities including a character admonishing Coco Martin's journalist protagonist for not having a discerning view of the subject he is covering while the movie, meanwhile, itself gives a "kid gloves" treatment of Noynoy Aquino.  The term "irony" seems too frail a word.

-  It's unintentionally funny in spots:  A mad scene involving drugs and blindness, a skimpily dressed Erich Gonzales showing up at rallies and Ondoy-ravaged areas and a denouement that has to be seen to be believed.

It really reminds me of those anti-communist propaganda pieces that Hollywood came up with in the 50's and those Christian movies that are now in vogue: Made with the best intentions.  I suppose the road to movie hell is paved with the best you-know-what. 

This film will not make it to the final five nominees.  I guarantee that.  I'll eat a Jollibee Yumburger (I'm semi-vegetarian) if it did.  It's a puzzling choice.  Was this postcard-to-the-President of a film chosen as a favor to Noynoy Aquino?  If it did, then it just confirmed that the film failed in its quest to send a message:  The movie itself rails against the Filipino trait of currying favors. 

Have not seen other Filipino films this year but have read reviews that seemed to indicate there are better ones out there.  Jowana Bueser does a good piece, too, on the prospects of "Noy." 

Action director and member of the special committee of FAP that chose "Noy," Jose Carreon, wrote a piece entitled "Mission Impossible" describing our history at the Oscars.  Is it really impossible?  With all due respect, Mr. Carreon, it is not:

It'll take a JFK-esque "Man on the Moon" effort, though.  It'll have to be a goal of the administration to come up with a program that will lead to an Oscar for the country.  Looking at what we have:  From the government side - Film Development Council of the Philippines (FDCP), Film Academy of the Philippines and the National Commission for Culture and the Arts and from the non-government - Cinemalaya, Mowelfund, etc....I think we have the structure for it.   

The FDCP can be tasked with taking the lead on this project.  The new chairman, filmmaker Briccio Santos, has indicated that he is an out-of-the-box thinker.

Like business incubators that act to "accelerate the successful development of entrepreneurial companies through an array of business support resources and services, developed and orchestrated...through network of contacts" this project would address both the business and creative side of filmmaking.

Creatively, it would be free from political interference and be composed of inventive individuals from a broad spectrum: writers, directors, composers, actors....Taking cue from the Sundance Lab, this project must be a collaborative effort from seasoned artists to emerging talents.  To be honest, there is a limited number of true talent here in all fields.   



A script would be chosen that others would work on.  Ample time will be given to the development of the script and the project - without it having to be rushed because of a local festival playdate.  What should the film be about?  It does not have to be a historical epic.  It, however, must have something new to say and be reflective of who we are: the good, the bad and the in-between.  It cannot be a travelogue.  Take a stroll through past nominees and you'll encounter cinema that's controversial, courageous and groundbreaking.
 
Financially,  it will have to be seen as a moneymaking venture.  Outside financing (from the US and Europe) is an option.  Importantly, the scope project should not be dictated by the budget.  The budget must adhere to the wishes of the project. 

Why must we do all these?  Can film...or a triumph in a cinematic pageant...transform a nation?  No, it's not a silver bullet but, rather, it is a step...one of thousands this country will need.  "Art" says that the human being being is capable of coming up with work that is creative, imaginative and powerful.  Imagine what this could do to a people that lack pride in themselves?

Can we pull this off?  I once was witness to a group of men whose task was to move items for the company I work for.  It was five guys and a leader who were well aware that it was a glass cabinet being moved and that extra care was needed.  I could sense, however, that they were not working as a team - that some of the individuals didn't seem to have full focus on the task at hand.  The leader- who may not have sensed this - did nothing to correct this.  True enough, it eventually led to a glass door being shattered.

Can we, as Filipinos, work selflessly together?  Do we have the capacity to not bicker and squabble? Would be truly a great subject for the film's "making of," wouldn't it?  

One thing that stood in "Noy" was the performance of the truly gifted Baron Geisler.  His portrayal of a world-weary editor gave the film some much needed depth. In a perfect world, more quality movies would be made with him starring in a number of them.  In the world we live in, he's stuck in minor roles in middling films.  Truly, a waste of Filipino talent.   

Now, if we do decide that the route I prescribed would be the best way to get an Oscar I've got this sure-fire script that's a cinch.  It's all about this.......